European Commission to Simplify the Procedures for Taking Part in EU-funded Research Projects

The overall aim is to make participation transparent and attractive to the best researchers and innovative companies in Europe and beyond. Ensuring European research realises its full potential is crucial to the EU's Europe 2020 Strategy, given the need to consolidate economic recovery and develop new sources of growth and jobs to replace those lost in the crisis. Complementing the proposals on simplification, the Commission has also appointed a group of independent experts to review all aspects of the current Seventh Framework Programme.

Research, Innovation and Science Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn said: "Our proposals aim to minimise administrative burdens in Europe's research programmes. We need to get the best researchers and most innovative companies taking part and we need to enable them to concentrate on results, not red tape. That will boost Europe's economy and quality of life. In particular, we must encourage more SME's to join in. I believe this can be done without compromising financial control. We are asking the other EU institutions for support to achieve this."

Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski added: "The review of the Financial regulation which the Commission will present next month will underpin these ideas for simplifying research funding with concrete legal proposals, helpful also in many other policy areas. We need simpler rules to encourage potential beneficiaries of EU funds - such as small and medium enterprises or NGOs - to apply for them. Simplification means the EU budget serving citizens and businesses better."

The first part of the Commission's strategy will make improvements possible under the current legal and regulatory framework, some of which are already underway. These involve, for example, better IT systems, more consistent application of rules, in particular on auditing, and improving the structure and content of the "calls for proposals" in response to which research organisations bid for funding.

The second part involves changing the existing financial rules to allow more radical simplification while maintaining effective control, for example by widening the use of "average cost methodologies" that avoid the need for projects to account separately and painstakingly for each small item of expenditure. The Commission also aims to allow projects to use the same accounting methods for EU funding as they are required to use for national research funding. These proposals require a decision of the European Parliament and the Council.

The third type of change envisaged will be considered for implementation under future Research Framework Programmes. Among the options presented is a move towards "payment by results", which would mean that beneficiaries were paid lump sums to undertake specific scientific tasks and would need to demonstrate that they have done so effectively and efficiently, rather than to report individual cost items.

In the meantime, the Commission has launched the interim evaluation of the current Programme (FP7). A group of independent experts, chaired by Mr. Rolf Annerberg, has been appointed to undertake this review and present their report this autumn.

Mr Annerberg is Director General of the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas). The mandate of the group covers a wide range of issues related to the design, implementation and impact of Framework Programme activities.

Background
FP7 has proved very attractive to the research community with more than 33,000 proposals received since 2007, almost 7000 projects funded. Nearly all European universities participate.

Several concrete steps have already been taken towards simplification of procedures both in setting up FP 7 and since it has been in progress.

For example, FP7 introduced a new Guarantee Fund and a single registration facility meaning organisations applying for funding for several projects over several years need only enter their details once. Eight out of ten participants in FP7 are now exempt from ex-ante financial capacity checks and three out of four participants are exempt from providing certificates on financial statements needed for periodic cost claims.

Two new Executive Agencies were set up by the Commission in 2007: the Research Executive Agency (REA) and the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERC-EA). The European Research Council is a flagship component of FP 7 and awards grants to projects headed by starting and established researchers, with no requirement for projects to involve cross-border consortia.

For further information, please visit:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm?pg=documents

Most Popular Now

Almost All Leading AI Chatbots Show Sign…

Almost all leading large language models or "chatbots" show signs of mild cognitive impairment in tests widely used to spot early signs of dementia, finds a study in the Christmas...

New Study Reveals Why Organisations are …

The slow adoption of blockchain technology is partly driven by overhyped promises that often obscure the complex technological, organisational, and environmental challenges, according to research from the University of Surrey...

Emotional Cognition Analysis Enables Nea…

A joint research team from the University of Canberra and Kuwait College of Science and Technology has achieved groundbreaking detection of Parkinson's disease with near-perfect accuracy, simply by analyzing brain...

New Recommendations to Increase Transpar…

Patients will be better able to benefit from innovations in medical artificial intelligence (AI) if a new set of internationally-agreed recommendations are followed. A new set of recommendations published in The...

Digital Health Unveils Draft Programme f…

18 - 19 March 2025, Birmingham, UK. Digital Health has unveiled the draft programme for its Rewired 2025 event which will take place at the NEC in Birmingham in March next...

AI System Helps Doctors Identify Patient…

A new study from Vanderbilt University Medical Center shows that clinical alerts driven by artificial intelligence (AI) can help doctors identify patients at risk for suicide, potentially improving prevention efforts...

Smartphone App can Help Reduce Opioid Us…

Patients with opioid use disorder can reduce their days of opioid use and stay in treatment longer when using a smartphone app as supportive therapy in combination with medication, a...

AI's New Move: Transforming Skin Ca…

Pioneering research has unveiled a powerful new tool in the fight against skin cancer, combining cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) with deep learning to enhance the precision of skin lesion classification...

Leveraging AI to Assist Clinicians with …

Physical examinations are important diagnostic tools that can reveal critical insights into a patient's health, but complex conditions may be overlooked if a clinician lacks specialized training in that area...

AI can Improve Ovarian Cancer Diagnoses

A new international study led by researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden shows that AI-based models can outperform human experts at identifying ovarian cancer in ultrasound images. The study is...

Major EU Project to Investigate Societal…

A new €3 million EU research project led by University College Dublin (UCD) Centre for Digital Policy will explore the benefits and risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) from a societal...

Predicting the Progression of Autoimmune…

Autoimmune diseases, where the immune system mistakenly attacks the body's own healthy cells and tissues, often have a preclinical stage before diagnosis that’s characterized by mild symptoms or certain antibodies...