Use of Wearable Device Does Not Improve Weight Loss

Among overweight or obese young adults, the addition of a wearable technology device (that provided feedback on physical activity) to a standard behavioral intervention resulted in less weight loss over 24 months, according to a study appearing in the September 20 issue of JAMA. Effective long-term treatments are needed to address the obesity epidemic. There is wide availability of commercial technologies for physical activity and diet. These technologies include wearable devices to monitor physical activity, with many also including an interface to monitor diet. These technologies may provide a method to improve longer-term weight loss; however, there are limited data on the effectiveness of such technologies for modifying health behaviors long term.

John M. Jakicic, Ph.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, and colleagues randomly assigned study participants to a standard behavioral weight loss intervention (n = 233) or technology-enhanced weight loss intervention (n = 237). Participants (body mass index [BMI], 25 to <40; age range, 18-35 years; 29 percent nonwhite; 77 percent women) were placed on a low-calorie diet, prescribed increases in physical activity, and had group counseling sessions. At 6 months, the interventions added telephone counseling sessions, text message prompts, and access to study materials on a website. Also at 6 months, participants randomized to the standard intervention group initiated self-monitoring of diet and physical activity using a website, and those randomly assigned to the enhanced intervention group were provided with a wearable device and accompanying web interface to monitor diet and physical activity. The trial was conducted between October 2010 and October 2012.

Seventy-five percent of participants completed the study. The researchers found that weight change at 24 months differed significantly by intervention group. Estimated average weights for the enhanced intervention group were 212 lbs. at study entry and 205 lbs. at 24 months, resulting in an average weight loss of about 7.7 lbs. Corresponding values for the standard intervention group were 210 lbs. at baseline and 197 lbs. at 24 months, for an average loss of 13 lbs. At 24 months, weight loss was 5.3 lbs. lower in the enhanced intervention group compared with the standard intervention group.

Both groups had significant improvements in body composition, fitness, physical activity, and diet, with no significant difference between groups.

"Devices that monitor and provide feedback on physical activity may not offer an advantage over standard behavioral weight loss approaches," the authors write.

The researchers add that the reason for the difference in weight loss between the groups warrants further investigation.

Jakicic JM, Davis KK, Rogers RJ, et al.
Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA. 2016;316(11):1161-1171. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12858.

Most Popular Now

Stanford Medicine Study Suggests Physici…

Artificial intelligence-powered chatbots are getting pretty good at diagnosing some diseases, even when they are complex. But how do chatbots do when guiding treatment and care after the diagnosis? For...

OmicsFootPrint: Mayo Clinic's AI To…

Mayo Clinic researchers have pioneered an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, called OmicsFootPrint, that helps convert vast amounts of complex biological data into two-dimensional circular images. The details of the tool...

Testing AI with AI: Ensuring Effective A…

Using a pioneering artificial intelligence platform, Flinders University researchers have assessed whether a cardiac AI tool recently trialled in South Australian hospitals actually has the potential to assist doctors and...

AI Accelerates the Search for New Tuberc…

Tuberculosis is a serious global health threat that infected more than 10 million people in 2022. Spread through the air and into the lungs, the pathogen that causes "TB" can...

Students Around the World Find ChatGPT U…

An international survey study involving more than 23,000 higher education students reveals trends in how they use and experience ChatGPT, highlighting both positive perceptions and awareness of the AI chatbot’s...

Adults don't Trust Health Care to U…

A study finds that 65.8% of adults surveyed had low trust in their health care system to use artificial intelligence responsibly and 57.7% had low trust in their health care...

How AI Bias Shapes Everything from Hirin…

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Google's Gemini and Microsoft’s Copilot are transforming industries at a rapid pace. However, as these large language models become less expensive and more widely...

AI Unlocks Genetic Clues to Personalize …

A groundbreaking study led by USC Assistant Professor of Computer Science Ruishan Liu has uncovered how specific genetic mutations influence cancer treatment outcomes - insights that could help doctors tailor...

The 10 Year Health Plan: What do We Need…

Opinion Article by Piyush Mahapatra, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Chief Innovation Officer at Open Medical. There is a new ten-year plan for the NHS. It will "focus efforts on preventing, as...

Deep Learning to Increase Accessibility…

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death globally. One of the most common tools used to diagnose and monitor heart disease, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by single photon...

People's Trust in AI Systems to Mak…

Psychologists warn that AI's perceived lack of human experience and genuine understanding may limit its acceptance to make higher-stakes moral decisions. Artificial moral advisors (AMAs) are systems based on artificial...

DMEA 2025 - Innovations, Insights and Ne…

8 - 10 April 2025, Berlin, Germany. Less than 50 days to go before DMEA 2025 opens its doors: Europe's leading event for digital health will once again bring together experts...